Abstract

Causal inference of exact individual treatment outcomes in the presence of hidden confounders is rarely possible. Recent work has extended prediction intervals with finite-sample guarantees to partially identifiable causal outcomes, by means of a sensitivity model for hidden confounding. In deep learning, predictors can exploit their inductive biases for better generalization out of sample. We argue that the structure inherent to a deep ensemble should inform a tighter partial identification of the causal outcomes that they predict. We therefore introduce an approach termed Caus-Modens, for characterizing causal outcome intervals by modulated ensembles. We present a simple approach to partial identification using existing causal sensitivity models and show empirically that Caus-Modens gives tighter outcome intervals, as measured by the necessary interval size to achieve sufficient coverage. The last of our three diverse benchmarks is a novel usage of GPT-4 for observational experiments with unknown but probeable ground truth.

Metadata

publication

Causal Learning and Reasoning, 18-40, 2024

year

2024

publication date

2024/3/15

authors

Myrl G Marmarelis, Greg Ver Steeg, Aram Galstyan, Fred Morstatter

link

https://proceedings.mlr.press/v236/marmarelis24a.html

resource_link

https://proceedings.mlr.press/v236/marmarelis24a/marmarelis24a.pdf

conference

Causal Learning and Reasoning

pages

18-40

publisher

PMLR